SEBASTIAN
RIMESTAD: MY VIEW ON THE UKRAINIAN CHURCH ISSUE
Dr.
Sebastian Rimestad has a Ph.D and Habilitationschrift from the
Ertfurt University, having also studied at the universities of
Aberdeen and Tartu. He posted his views in his personal Fb account
A
- The Orthodox Church is traditionally organised as territorially
defined independent (autocephalous) churches. However, since the last
Ecumenical Council (acknowledged as such by the Orthodox Church) in
787 AD, there has been no supreme instance recognising autocephaly,
and the churches have relied on mutual recognition. This worked fine
in many cases, but there are some that prove more difficult than
others - for example Ukraine.
B
- The Church of Kiev, which was founded with Prince Vladimir in the
year 988, then reported to the Ecumenical Patriarchate of
Constantinople (EP), who assigned the Metropolitans of Kiev etc. The
Church only became autocephalous several centuries later, after the
capital of the Rus' (Russia's predecessor) had moved to Moscow,
whereas Kiev was situated in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. The
Moscow Russians considered themselves independent already 1448, but
officially were recognised as such by Constantinople only in 1589,
when they also became the Patriarchate of Moscow (MP).
C
- In 1686, there was an agreement between the EP and the MP that the
MP was to select the Metropolitan of Kiev, although the latter
technically still belonged to the Church of the EP.
D
- big jump forward in time, to 1991, when Ukraine becomes independent
from the Soviet Union, and immediately there are voices, who argue
that an independent Ukraine needs an autocephalous church. There had
been similar voices in the 1920s and also in the 1940s (during the
war), but MP refuses to accord full independence (autocephaly),
claiming that wide internal autonomy is sufficient. As a result, the
Orthodox Church in Ukraine splits into three (four) branches –
1.
The Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the MP (UOCMP), which is the only
recognised structure by world Orthodoxy;
2.
The Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Kiev Patriarchate (UOCKP), led
by self-proclaimed Patriarch Filaret (Denysenko), not recognised by
any other recognised Orthodox Church. Filaret also has a dubious
past, with KGB-involvement (who hasn't?) and even a secret wife and
children. The MP decides to declare him schismatic and even
excommunicate him - officially not because of his personal issues,
but because he undermines MP integrity.
3.
The Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church (UAOC), which had existed
in the 1920s and 1940s and is especially strong in the North American
Ukrainian community. MP never recognised any part of this church, but
EP accepted its North American structures under his jurisdiction in
1991.
4.
The Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church (UGCC) is a revival of the Uniate
Church that has existed in the region between Catholicism and
Orthodoxy since 1596. It is an Orthodox Rite Church that has
acknowledged the universal jurisdiction of the Roman Pontiff. I will
not mention this group anymore.
E
- This year, as Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko petitioned the
EP with parliamentary backing to create a single unified Ukrainian
independent Orthodox Church, the EP decided to study the documents
and came to the conclusion that the 1686 decision still is valid,
making the Metropolia of Kiev technically an EP-controlled territory.
On October 11, the EP made the decision to rehabilitate the leaders
of the two 'schismatic' churches in Ukraine, in order to prepare the
way for a Council of all Bishops of all three Ukrainian Orthodox
Churches that would found a united church and elect a leader, whom
the EP then would be able to accord autocephaly.
F
- This plan would work perfectly, were it not for the opposition from
the MP, which tries, with all its power, to discredit the EP and its
decision. It uses Filaret's personality, historical precedence, and
previous standpoints of the EP that contradict his current ones to do
this. Moreover, both sides accuse the other of spreading
disinformation, which is not an exaggeration.
G
- The MP has, on October 15, decided to break communion with the EP.
This means that the MP considers the EP schismatic and no longer part
of the Orthodox Church. So far, no other church has officially sided
with one or the other Patriarchate, but this also means that apart
from the MP, nobody has broken communion with each other. The EP
still considers the MP part of the Orthodox Church and hopes it will
agree to its conditions in Ukraine.