INTERMARRIAGE IN THE CANONICAL TRADITION OF THE ORTHODOX CHURCH

Răzvan Perșa, ”Intermarriage in the Canonical Tradition of the Orthodox Church”, Review of Ecumenical Studies, 10, 3 (2018), pp. 346-372

A CANONICAL ANALYSIS OF THE MOST CONTROVERSIAL PHRASE OF THE HOLY AND GREAT COUNCIL: THE ORTHODOX CHURCH ACCEPTS THE HISTORICAL NAME OF OTHER NON-ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHURCHES AND CONFESSIONS THAT ARE NOT IN COMMUNION WITH HER.

RĂZVAN PERȘA.

Abstract: In this paper I will try to emphasise the genesis and the development of the phrase: "the Orthodox Church accepts the historical name of other non-Orthodox Christian Churches and Confessions", by finding how this highly controversial formulation emerged and who were its promoters. Surprisingly, the direct promoter of this formulation of the final document of the Third Pre-conciliar Pan-orthodox Conference is none other than Theodoros Zisis, at that time a consultant member of the Ecumenical Patriarchate.

THE CANONICAL TRADITION OF THE ORTHODOX CHURCH AND THE HOLY AND GREAT COUNCIL BETWEEN RECEPTION AND REJECTION

RĂZVAN PERȘA, Invited Assistant Lecturer at the Faculty oˆ Orthodox Theology, Cluj‐Napoca. PhD Candidate at the Faculty oˆ Orthodox Theology, Arad., 
Studia Theologia Orthodoxa, 1 (2017), PP.39-42

THE CANONICAL TRADITION OF THE ORTHODOX CHURCH AND THE HOLY AND GREAT COUNCIL. BETWEEN RECEPTION AND REJECTION

Răzvan Perșa, „The Canonical Tradition of the Orthodox Church and the Holy and Great