Response to the address of HAH the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I
Rev. Dr Olav Fykse Tveit, General Secretary, World Council of Churches
Response to the Address of HAH the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I
The Ecumenical Centre, 24 April 2017
Rev. Dr Olav Fykse Tveit, General Secretary, World Council of Churches
Response to the Address of HAH the Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I
The Ecumenical Centre, 24 April 2017
Photos: Nikos Kosmidis /WCC and Albin Hillert /WCC
World Council of Churches
World Council of Churches
Your All Holiness, first of all I express our gratitude
for this significant contribution to our understanding of what the
divine call to be one means - today. You have clearly shown that the
call for the Church to be one is a call to search the truth in love. The
call to be one is of the highest relevance for the service of the
Church in a polarized and divided world. You elaborated what it means in
a world of many challenges and sufferings, injustices and threats to
our life together on our planet Earth. Your personal history and
reflections carry the essence of what the ecumenical movement is at
large and what the 70 years of the World Council of Churches have
brought to you and your Church.
You have explained what it means for the Orthodox
Churches to share this vision and calling to unity, as it has been
elaborated in the Holy and Great Council of the Orthodox Churches in
June 2016. Furthermore, you have reflected on the basic call and purpose
of the World Council of Churches in relation to significant dimensions
of our work in our time. You are truly challenging all churches by your
convincing reflections for why the churches must again and again call
one another to be one, through dialogue and sharing, and why they again
and again together must address the threats to our world and to the one
humanity. This they must do to be faithful to the truth we have
received.
Your All Holiness, in your leadership, you have given
many examples of how this faithfulness to Tradition must be expressed in
responses to the challenges of today and tomorrow. Your own ecumenical
journey, as you describe it, and your understanding of the Church and
how its unity is serving the world, have given a model for integration
of the many dimensions of our ecumenical calling. The way you address
some of the issues on our agenda, is a great motivation for us who are
working for the World Council of Churches in our time. You also share
insights and perspectives of great value for our self-understanding as
we approach the 70th anniversary of our fellowship and organization.
However, in different ways you help us to move our
attention away from a preoccupation of what restricts our attention to
what is relevant for our self-assertion or our self-interest, even if
they might be interesting to discuss. This is indeed the motivation for
us as well as the outcome of the ecumenical dialogue. We learn that
there is more, more to be shared, more to be learned, more to be done
together. Indeed, we see what you have learned and what you have to
teach us from the wisdom of the late Ecumenical Patriarch Athenagoras: “Come let us look one another in the eyes, and let us then see what we have to say to one another.”
I find that this quote - as well as your entire
presentation - illustrated that the ecumenical dialogue between churches
has a great and not yet exhausted relevance for the churches. This is
also expressed in your continued support to the work of “Faith and
Order”.
You also have shown that precisely the dialogue between
the churches - as it is pursued in the ecumenical movement - does
represent a special contribution with an added value to the wider
humanitarian dialogue for justice and peace in the world. The way you
connect these two dimensions of dialogue and cooperation between the
churches can make many of us curious: Why is our theological dialogue
also a dialogue relevant for the wider human family?
This is a question that leads us to the heart of the
rationale and work of the World Council of Churches, but it is relevant
far beyond that. Why has what we do in this house and in these
organizations inspired by the call to be one as churches an added value
for the human family?
This question is somehow answered in the guiding theme
of the World Council of Churches at the moment. We engage both in deep
theological dialogues, and address many contexts where we work for just
peace together with the churches locally. When we define our work as a
World Council of Churches today as being “Together on a pilgrimage of
justice and peace”, we are seeking exactly this kind of openness in
dialogue between churches, inviting also “all people of good will” to
join us on our pilgrimage. We do this so that we can better find the way
forward, together, in our common witness and service for a better
world, for a better future.
As churches together we are guided by what is given to
us in the Holy Scripture interpreted through the Tradition of the
Church. We believe that the Holy Spirit continues to guide our
understanding. Your All Holiness emphasises that we can be helped to be
faithful to the truth given to us by being part of the ongoing dialogue,
not by retreating from it. This is indeed a significant encouragement
to all churches to continue the dialogue among them, particularly when
we have different or diverging positions.
This is something more than searching for compromises
among us. It is a search for the truth of the will of God. This is a
search for the truth – in love. Therefore, this search for the truth is
also a search for the truth about the reality, sometimes the harsh and
ugly reality, in which we and others live. You have showed through
different examples how this has been done and must be done in the search
for the truth about the environment, about the threats to access for
clean and drinkable water, about the truth of the lives of children in
our time. This joint search for the truth is based on the truth that is
given to us in the Gospel about the grace of God, the will of God, the
love of God, applied into the search for the truth in love with the
oppressed, the marginalized, the suffering, the poor.
You also know a lot about the suffering of Christian
sisters and brothers, and the quest for the survival of the churches
particularly in the Middle East. Calling for accountability means that
states must stop the crimes of terror. In our inter-faith dialogues,
which you strongly support, we must call for accountability to the
shared values of care for life, the principle of shared citizenship, and
mutual respect for one another. Violence in the name of religion cannot
be done without violating the values of religion. Violence in the name
of God towards those who are created in the image of God becomes
violence against God. We are from the beginning to the end accountable
to God.
The ecumenical dialogue is a search for the truth that
we owe each other as churches. We have insights into the truth that are
to be shared, to be elaborated and explained. We have insights to the
truth that we share in dialogue because we need to see also other
expressions and dimensions to the truth in one another. This is why we
again and again have “to see one another in the eye”, this is why
dialogue is not only a business for a while to achieve consensus. It is
the modus of life together.
This requires that the dialogue is conducted with the
relevant ecumenical attitude of being mutually accountable to one
another. Your All Holiness, you elaborate in your address what that
means and why it is necessary for the churches. Let me mention some
examples:
You offer a highly interesting and illuminating
reflection about the process leading to the Holy and Great Council of
the Orthodox Church. These last days we have celebrated the 50 years of
the Orthodox Centre of The Ecumenical Patriarchate in Chambésy. I had
the privilege to invite you and the other Primates of the Orthodox
churches for dinner in Bossey as you met here for the last Synaxis in
January 2016. In your exposé, you describe the meaning and the challenge
of being in council with one another as churches. You describe the
potential tension between, on the one hand, the independence of
Autocephalous churches as they search for and define their positions in
relation to their traditions and contexts; and on the other hand, the
need for a common, conciliar process and assessment of what is the true
Orthodox common way forward.
This tension is present in all churches and in all
church families, and you illustrate why the conciliar approach is also
so relevant for all churches.
Furthermore, you show why this shared and mutual
accountability is necessary for the future of the life together today
and tomorrow as human beings created to live in fellowship in our common
home.
Being accountable to God the creator of all and of all
things means that we have to pay attention to where our common life as
humanity and our creation is under threat. It is well deserved that Your
Holiness has been granted the title “The Green Patriarch”, and you have
given many church leaders and faithful Christians a new perspective on
the Christian call to care for Creation.
We are mutually accountable, not only to one another as
the church leaders or political leaders in a country or internationally,
but we are accountable to the most vulnerable among us in a very
profound way. This is our accountability to God the creator. The
children can call us to accountability and they will call us to
accountability for what we did for their protection, for their
well-being, for how we nourished their bodies and minds, for how we
cared for their basic needs of love and care, for how we cared for the
environment in which they shall live and already live. We have to search
the truth about their lives and the threats to their lives now, as many
of them are suffering from violence, migration, war, but also from
being led into slavery or being deprived of their rights to proper
education and health services. We have to search for the truth about the
life of children even in our church contexts and in the families
themselves. Domestic violence is the most common expression of violence
against children.
Searching the truth in mutual accountability under God
the Creator means also that we are calling for accountability to the
joint agreements to protect our planet earth. The call to be accountable
and implement the Paris agreement is a very concrete expression of how
the search for the truth and the mutually accountable relations go
together.
Your All Holiness, let me express how I as a Lutheran
theologian and pastor and leader in the ecumenical movement am greatly
indebted to you and your way of being accountable to our one Christian
Tradition and to the ecumenical dialogue. Being a Lutheran, I see
particularly the relevance of your call to search the truth in dialogue
as an affirmation of the lasting value and relevance of what we now
commemorate as Reformation. The Reformation was in its origin a call to
be accountable to one another by being honest with God, through
accountability to the Holy Scripture and the way we practice our
spiritual lives. The repentance must be done in mutual accountability to
one another, not as a method of buying us out of our responsibilities.
You make in your address the expression of “sin”
relevant in many issues and contexts of our time. You thereby contribute
to this attitude of accountability: Let us be honest and see what we
have done when we contribute to violence against others or against
nature. Let us acknowledge that it is sin. It is not according to the
will of God. However, the cross is not the end. The resurrection of
Christ shows us another way.
This way of being mutually accountable in our commitment
to dialogue can lead us to liberation and help us to find sustainable
new ways forward. The ecumenical dialogue can serve the world as a way
of both the cross and the resurrection. Our shared faith in Jesus Christ
is in its essence: hope.
Thank you, again, Your All Holiness, for your
inspiration to continue our pilgrimage of justice and peace, as people
of faith and hope and love. In your leadership these 25 years you have
affirmed the significance of the ecumenical dialogue for the churches
and for the world. Today we give thanks for the way you have offered a
role model for many leaders in the Church, as well as for leaders in
other positions to be leading with the attitudes of accountability and
love. May God grant you many years of health and strength to continue
this ministry among us!