.png "English"){kind=small}
Minutes of the Session of the Holy Synod
(25.05.2016)
On May 25 2016, the regular plenary
session of the Holy Synod of the Orthodox Church of Georgia was held at
the Patriarchate of Georgia. The Catholicos-Patriarch of All Georgia
Ilia II acted as the Chairman of the session.
Metropolitan Shio (Mujiri)
of Senaki and Chkhopotsku was appointed Secretary of the session. The
Catholicos-Patriarch of All Georgia Ilia II gave an opening speech in
which he greeted the members of the Holy Synod and congratulated the
Georgian nation on the Day of the Restoration of Independence.
Besides this, two deplorable facts,
which took place recently in Georgia, were mentioned at the session. The
first of them was the murder of Giorgi Otkhozoria, a resident of the
Region of Gali, internally displaced from Apkhazeti. This atrocious
crime took place in the village of Khurcha. The Holy Synod expressed
their condolences to the family of the deceased and pray for his soul.
Also, the Holy Synod expressed their disapproval of the incident which
took place in the village of Kortskheli. The Holy Synod called every
political and social organisation to direct their efforts towards mutual
respect and peace.
The Catholicos-Patriarch of Georgia
spoke on the significance of the Holy and Great Council and thanked the
clergy and lay people who had participated in the preliminary work which
preceded the Council. Following this, the floor was given to the
hierarchs of the Holy Synod who were requested to express their opinions
on the documents drawn up for the Council.
The representative of the Church of
Georgia in the Secretariat of the Holy Council, Metropolitan Andrew
(Gvazava) of Gori and Ateni, gave a short analysis of the mentioned
documents.
Metropolitan Theodore (Tchuadze) of
Akhaltsikhe and Tao-Klarjeti spoke on the documents “The Sacrament of
Marriage and Impediments to It” and “The Mission of the Orthodox Church
in the Contemporary World”.
The Holy Synod concluded that two places
in the text of “The Sacrament of Marriage and Impediments to It”
require alterations, which are, specifically:
Article 10 of the subchapter “Orthodox Marriage”;
Subparagraph “a” of article 5 in the subchapter “Impediments to Marriage”;
Article 10 of the subchapter “Orthodox
Marriage” reads: “The Church does not accept a marriage between her
members of the same sex; neither does she accept any kind of living
together other than that within the bond of Holy Matrimony. The Church
directs all her pastoral efforts towards the goal that her members
living within such bonds attain true repentance and love, blessed by the
Church”.
This subparagraph must be changed in the following way:
“The Church cannot accept a sexual
relationship between persons of the same sex, neither can she accept any
kind of living together other than in Holy Matrimony, and condemns this
sin. The Church is concerned about the eternal lot of the immortal
souls of people who continue to live with such a sin, and directs all
her pastoral efforts towards their help in cognizing the extreme
grievance of this sin to depart from it by way of the true repentance”.
Subparagraph “a” of article 5 of the
second subchapter of “Impediments to Marriage” reads: “Marriage between
the Orthodox and the non-Orthodox is forbidden according to the
canonical acribia and is not blessed (canon 72 of the Trullo Council);
however, it can be blessed through tolerance and loving-kindness, but
only on condition that the children born within such a marriage will be
baptised and brought up in the bosom of the Orthodox Church”.
In the aforementioned article, the first
part of the text must be maintained, which reads: “Marriage between an
Orthodox and a non-Orthodox is forbidden according to the canonical
acribia and is not blessed (canon 72 of the Trullo Council);” but the
second part, which reads: “however, it can be blessed through tolerance
and loving-kindness, but only on condition that the children born within
such a marriage will be baptised and brought up in the bosom of the
Orthodox Church”, must be removed as it contradicts the 72nd canon of the Ecumenical Council VI.
As is known, no council can contradict, cancel or alter any of the canons adopted by the Ecumenical Councils.
In the document “The Mission of the Orthodox Church in the Contemporary World” the following alterations must be made:
From the main subtitle, which reads:
“The Contribution of the Orthodox Church in the Cause of Attaining
Peace, Justice, Freedom, Brotherhood and Love Among Nations, in Order to
Eradicate Racial Discrimination, and Also to Eradicate Other Types of Discrimination”, the phrase – “and Also to Eradicate Other Types of Discrimination” – must be removed since it leaves room for a versatile understanding of the text.
Subparagraph 3 of subtitle “a” of the
same document (“The Dignity of the Human Person”) reads: “A general
acknowledgment of the dignity of a human person could be considered a
precondition for a wider collaboration in this field. Local Orthodox
Churches are called to put their mite in to interreligious dialogue and
collaboration; and while doing so, in prevailing over a manifestation of
any kind of fanaticism in order to help promote friendship among
peoples, freedom and peace in the entire world, for the benefit of every
human being irrespective of their race and religious adherence. This
implies that this collaboration excludes syncretism as well as attempts
of violence from any religion over other religions”.
According to the provisions of the
Synod, the aforementioned text should be formulated in the following
form: “In this field, we could consider the general acknowledgement of
the dignity of a human person as a precondition for a wider
collaboration. The Orthodox Churches are called to put their mite into
interreligious dialogue and collaboration, and while doing so, in
prevailing over any manifestation of fanaticism, to help promote
friendship among peoples, freedom and peace in the entire world for the
benefit of every human being, with the objective of their
purification, deification and salvation in the Kingdom of God,
irrespective of their race or adherence to their religion. This
implies that this collaboration excludes syncretism as well as attempts
of violence from any religion over other religions. This, naturally, does not imply the denial of the missionary work of the Holy Church”.
In the first paragraph of subtitle “c” (“On Freedom and Justice”) the following text must be retained:
“The Orthodox Church primordially has
acknowledged and declared that peace and justice take central place in
the lives of peoples. In Christ this revelation is characterised as the
“gospel of peace” (Ephes. 6:15) since Christ “having made peace through
the blood of his cross” (Col. 1:20), “preached peace to you who were
afar off and to those who were near” (Ephes. 2:17). He became “our
peace” (Ephes. 2:14). This peace, “which surpasses all understanding”
(Phil. 4:7), as our Lord Himself told His Disciples before the
Crucifixion, is broader and more meaningful than that peace which is
promised by this world: “Peace I leave with you, My peace I give to you,
not as the world gives do I give to you (John 14:27)”.
But the second part of the same article
which says: “The peace of Christ is a mature fruit of ingathering in it
of everything: a human person, as the image of God, the expression of
the dignity and glory of the human generation and Universe, the
conventionality of the principles of peace, freedom and social justice,
and lastly, the reaping of the fruit of Christian love among men and
among the peoples of the world” – must be removed.
In the text also remains the last
section of the text: “The true peace is the fruit of the consolidation
of all Christian principles. This is the peace granted from Heaven which
the Orthodox Church prays for in her everyday prayers, implores the
Almighty God Who hears the prayers of those who come to Him with faith”.
Thus, the first article will be stated as follows: “The
Orthodox Church has primordially confessed and proclaimed that peace
and justice take central place in peoples’ lives. In Christ this
revelation is characterised as the “gospel of peace” (Ephes. 6:15) since
Christ “having made peace through the blood of his cross” (Col. 1:20),
“preached peace to you who were afar off and to those who were near”
(Ephes. 2:17). He became “our peace” (Ephes. 2:14). This peace, “which
surpasses all understanding” (Phil. 4:7), as our Lord Himself told His
Disciples before the Crucifixion, is broader and more meaningful than
that peace which is promised by this world: “Peace I leave with you, My
peace I give to you, not as the world gives do I give to you (John
14:27)”. The true peace is the fruit of the consolidation of all
Christian principles. It is peace given from Heaven which the Orthodox
Church prays for in her everyday prayers, implores the Almighty God Who
hears the prayers of those who come to Him with faith”.
Metropolitan Stephen (Kalaijishvili) of Tsageri and Lentekhi gave a talk on the document “The Attitude of the Church to the Rest of the Christian World”.
Also were read notes written on the mentioned document by Professor
Edisher Chelidze of Tbilisi Theological Academy and Seminary. On the
text, various opinions were expressed by Metropolitan Anania (Japaridze)
of Manglisi; Metropolitan Grigol (Berbichashvili) of Poti and Khobi;
Metropolitan Nicholoz (Pachuashvili) of Akhalkalaki and Kumurdo;
Metropolitan Peter (Tsaava) of Chkondidi; Metropolitan Ioane (Gamrekeli)
of Rustavi; and Metropolitan Jacob (Iakobishvili) of Bodbe.
It was noted that the document had been
from its inception unacceptable for the representatives of the Church of
Georgia and that it had only been signed at the preliminary meeting
because the following sentence was written in the text: “The Orthodox
Churches of Georgia and Bulgaria left the World Council of Churches; the
first of them left it in 1997 and the latter – in 1998, since they have
their own opinions on the activity of the World Council of Churches
which is why they do not participate in the events of the mentioned
Council and other activities of the inter-Christian organisations.”
The Holy Synod has concluded that the
mentioned document contains ecclesiological and terminological errors
and requires serious alterations. If the alterations are not made, the
Church of Georgia will not sign the text.
On the initiative of Metropolitan Grigol
(Berbichashvili) of Poti and Khobi, the Holy Synod has determined: a
theological group should be created which will present their proposals
on a number of theological questions to the Holy Synod.
The Holy Synod heard the speech of Metropolitan Sabba (Gigiberia) of Khoni and Samtredia on the organisational questions.
The Holy Synod has named the members of the delegation of the Church of Georgia. The following is a list of those named:
The Catholicos-Patriarch of All Georgia Ilia II;
- Metropolitan Kalistrate (Margalitashvili of Kutaisi and Gaenti;
- Metropolitan Daniel (Datuashvili) of Sachkhere and Chiatura;
- Metropolitan Anania (Japaridze) of Manglisi;
- Metropolitan Giorgi (Shalamberidze) of Tkibuli and Terjola;
- Abba Metropolitan David (Makharadze) of Alaverdi;
- Metropolitan Sergi (Chekurishvili) of Nekresi;
- Metropolitan Joseph (Kikvidze) of Shemokmedi;
- Metropolitan Nicholoz (Pachuashvili) of Akhalkalaki and Kumurdo, and of South America;
- Metropolitan Theodore (Chuadze) of Akhaltsikhe and Tao-Klarjeti;
- Metropolitan Sabba (Gigiberia) of Khoni and Samtredia;
- Metropolitan Gerasim (Sharashenidze) of Zugdidi and Tsaishi;
- Metropolitan Andrew (Gvazava) of Gori and Ateni;
- Metropolitan Stephan (Kalaijishvili) of Tsageri and Lentekhi;
- Metropolitan Shio (Mujiri) of Senaki and Chkhorotsku and of Australia;
- Metropolitan Ioane (Gamrekeli) of Rustavi;
- Archbishop Spiridon (Abuladze) of Skhalta;
- Archbishop Luke (Lomidze) of Sagarejo and Ninotsminda;
- Bishop Michael (Gabrichidze) of Tianeti and Pshav-Khevsureti;
- Bishop Dimitri (Kapanadze) of Khornabuji and Hereti;
- Bishop Damian (Khupenia) of Samtavisi and Kaspi;
- Bishop Grigol (Katsia) of Tsalka;
- Bishop Dositheos (Bogveradze) of Belgium and Holland;
- Bishop Sabba (Intskirveli) of North America;
- Bishop Vakhtang (Liparteliani) of Nikortsminda;
- Protopresbyter Giorgi Zviadadze;
- Archimandrite David Chincharauli;
- Archpriest David Sharashenidze;
- Archpriest Kakhaber Gogotishvili;
- Hieromonk Michael Bregvadze;
- Monk Anthimoz (Javakhishvili).
P.S. More detailed information on each aforementioned topic will be published soon.
