spc.rs
Referring to the Holy and Great Council of the Orthodox Church
9. June 2016 - 11:53
1. Message of the Holy Assembly of Bishops of the Serbian
Orthodox Church concerning the convocation of the Holy and Great
Council to be held on Crete on the occasion of the feast-day of the
Holy Trinity, from 17th to the 27th of June 2016.
The Holy Assembly of Bishops of
the Serbian Orthodox Church
№ 62/min. 164
25. Мay 2016
Belgrade
the Serbian Orthodox Church
№ 62/min. 164
25. Мay 2016
Belgrade
МESSAGE OF THE HOLY ASSEMBLY OF BISHOPS
OF THE SERBIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH
to Primates and Holy Synods of the Local Orthodox Churches
OF THE SERBIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH
to Primates and Holy Synods of the Local Orthodox Churches
In
the days of the most joyful Christian Feast, which fills every human
being and all of creation with catholic meaning and good tidings of
salvation in Christ, we welcome the summoning of autocephalous Orthodox
Churches to the Holy and Great Synod which, if God allows it, will be
held at the Orthodox Academy in Crete, on Pentecost, from 17 to 26 June
2016.
In brotherly love, with responsibility and great hopes, we
reflect on this Holy and Great Synod during the session of our Local
Church’s Assembly, and remind ourselves as well as others that the
Orthodox Church is a Synod (Council), called by God in Christ and
inspired by His Holy Spirit, as was the Synod of Holy Apostles, which
took the following words as its guiding hand: “For it has seemed good to
the Holy Spirit and to us” (Acts 15, 28). We rejoice at the prospect of
commencement of the Holy and Great Synod on the Feast of descent of the
Holy Spirit. For, it is and should be a pneumatic, Pentecostal event of
communion (κοινωνία) of Churches. Assembled in order to “accordantly
celebrate the All-Holy Spirit”, we believe that where the Church abides,
there the Holy Spirit abides as well; and, where the Spirit of God
abides, there abide the Church and all grace, and the Spirit is truth”
(Saint Irenaeus of Lyons, Against Heresies 3, 2, 4, 1).
Being
aware of the magnitude and importance of this Synod, with sacred
trepidation we wonder whether the pending Synod fulfills the criteria
and measure of true synods from the history of the Orthodox Church.
Alongside, we ask whether the Synod will express the unity of the Church
of Christ in the Holy Spirit, to the glory of God the Father: that
unity which we ceaselessly witness and invoke in the Holy Liturgy:
“Having prayed for the unity of faith and for the communion of the Holy
Spirit”. We remind ourselves and others: this unity is a concrete unity
according to the image of the Holy Trinity (Jn. 17, 21), the unity of
the Body of Christ, “by good will of the Father…, and the communion of
the Holy Spirit”. This is the unity in One Christ as One and Only Head
of the divine-human Body of the Church regarded as Home of the Father,
Abiding place of the Holy Spirit and Body of Christ the Savior.
In
thoughts and in feelings we immerse ourselves into the theme of the
oncoming Synod and, with reason, we ask whether and in what measure the
imminent Synod expresses the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church
(as we confess in the Creed). Therefore, aware of the historic
importance of this Great Synod for the witness and mission of the
Orthodox Church in the contemporary world, the Holy Assembly of Bishops
of the Serbian Orthodox Church, with regard to the issue of composition
of membership, themes and rules regulating the work of the Holy and
Great Synod, offers the following standpoints to the attention of
Forestanders and Holy Synods of Local Orthodox Churches:
1. With
regard to the accepted Code of Regulations for organizing the work of
the Holy and Great Synod of the Orthodox Church, it is our position that
it allows the introduction of a practice unknown in the synods of the
Orthodox Church which have hitherto come to pass: mostly due to the
imparity and inequality of all bishops at the Synod. We do not discern
in it the centennial living conciliar Tradition of summoning, of
presiding at a Synod, of realizing a Synod and of administrating it. So
far no one in history has determined and prescribed in advance the code
of regulations of work of the Synod. For, this was realized by the Holy
Synod itself in virtue of its conciliarity. One could gain the
impression that the accentuation of certain “rights” of summoning and
presiding makes the Synod a function of one man, even if he happens to
be the first. It is Saint Paul who advises as follows: “… Outdo one
another in showing honor” (Rom. 12, 10). If it happens to be the case
that this Code of Regulations anticipates and controls the work of the
Synod in advance, then little space will be left for freedom of the
members of the Synod in the Holy Spirit and for what the Apostles
formulate by the following words: “For it has seemed good to the Holy
Spirit and to us” (Acts 15, 28).
2. The mentioned weaknesses of
this Code of Regulations lead us to the question about the role and
status of bishops at this Synod. Are bishops at the Synod to be regarded
as participants or as viewers? Apart from the unjustified limiting of
the number of participants in the Synod, we hold that the fact that not
all bishops have the right of vote is unjustified as well. We believe
that the right of vote is not contrary to the proclaimed principle of
consensus (which, by rule, is preceded by consultations) and we hold
that free and responsible voting by bishops would not restrain the
unanimous witness of the Orthodox Church to the glory of God celebrated
in the Trinity. The conciliar Tradition of the One Church presupposes
the right to vote of each bishop in the Synod, from regional to
ecumenical one. This Synod is an occasion to manifest the multitude of
local Churches (most of them) to the joy of the Mother Church, — the
first in throne Church of Constantinople, — as well as the Mother of all
Churches, the Church of Sion.
3. In view of the fact that the
question of communion between autocephalous Churches is of crucial
importance for the mission of the Orthodox Church in the world, we deem
it necessary to discuss the theme of autocephaly, and our Church has
insisted on this incessantly. This Synod has a sufficient number of
theological and pastoral motifs to acknowledge that today fourteen
autocephalous Churches exist and that this is sufficient to confirm
their status. Besides, within current preparations for the Synod the
theme of autocephaly has been explored in detail, as well as the way in
which it is proclaimed, except for the way of signing. Therefore, it is
wholly justified and appropriate at the Holy and Great Synod to accept
and proclaim that which for decades has been processed and completed.
4.
Confessing the unity and unbroken conciliar Tradition of the Orthodox
Church, we think that it is not true that there were no synods within
the Orthodox Church during the centuries; although it stands as true
that in the newer centuries we have not held a single pan-Orthodox or
ecumenical Synod. Bearing in mind their dogmatic-ecclesiological
importance and pan-Orthodox endorsement, our local Church proposes that
the ecumenical importance of the Holy Synod of 879/880, held in the time
of Saint Photius of Constantinople, should be confirmed, and that the
hesychastic Synod held in 1351 should be confirmed as well. In proposing
the conciliar confirmation of these Holy Synods, we have in mind the
word of Saint Maximus the Confessor: “The God-revering rule of the
Church recognizes as holy and confirmed those synods which have been
confirmed by rightness of the dogmas”.
5. Acting in the spirit of
the decision of all most holy local Orthodox Churches, namely that each
of them is called to actively and ceaselessly participate in the
conciliar event of the Church, we express our standpoint that the six
prepared texts, although basically good, need amendment and re-working
in order to be brought into concordance with the demands of life and
mission of the Church. The text Оn the Mission of the Church in the
Contemporary World stands in need of enrichment by the Gospel, that is,
by soteriological and cosmological dimensions of salvation. In
connection to the text Оn the Relation With the Christian World we think
that the highly condescending attitude towards other religions should
not stifle awareness of the need for the evangelization of this world.
We stress that the question of Diaspora should be solved conciliarily,
by agreement and pan-Orthodox consensus, under the presidency of the
Primate of Constantinople, but, with equal participation of throne
co-holders, Orthodox Primates, and their Holy Assemblies or Synods.
Last
but not least, the Holy and Great Synod of the Orthodox Church, also,
is a call for repentance of all, according to the decree of Christ: “The
time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand; repent, and
believe in the gospel!” (Мk. 1, 15). In that way this Holy and Great
Synod of the Orthodox Church will be a renewal and confirmation of the
living, true and salvific faith, “… which was once for all delivered to
the saints” (Јu. 3); and, it will confirm the true divine-human
catholicity (ecumenicity) of Orthodoxy, in time and space, for “Jesus
Christ is the same yesterday and today and for ever” (Heb. 13, 8).
Аrchbishop of Peć, Metropolitan of Belgrade-Karlovci and
Serbian Patriarch
Serbian Patriarch
Irinej
President of the Holy Assembly of Bishops
President of the Holy Assembly of Bishops
2. Letter of the Holy Synod of Bishops of the Serbian Orthodox Church to His Holiness Ecumenical Patriarch Sir Sir Bartholomew, a copy of which has been sent to all the Primates of Orthodox Churches and their Holy Synods
The Holy Synod of Bishops of
the Serbian Orthodox Church
№ 793
6. jun 2016
Belgrade
the Serbian Orthodox Church
№ 793
6. jun 2016
Belgrade
To His Holiness
Archbishop of Constantinople, New Rome, and Ecumenical Patriarch
Sir Sir Bartholomew
Constantinople
Archbishop of Constantinople, New Rome, and Ecumenical Patriarch
Sir Sir Bartholomew
Constantinople
Subject: Holy and Great Synod
Christ is risen!
Most
Holy Archbishop of Constantinople, New Rome, and Ecumenical Patriarch,
beloved brother in Christ and co-celebrant of Our humbleness, Sir
Bartholomew, most wholeheartedly we greet Your respected Holiness with
brotherly embrace in the Lord.
We deem it unnecessary to stress
the measure of hope, sincere commitment and contribution, according to
our capacity, with which our Church participated in the preparation of
the Holy and Great Synod of the Orthodox Catholic Church.
However, having taken into consideration:
1.
the dissatisfaction and critical remarks of certain local Churches in
regard to particular texts, prepared in the pre-Synodal period;
2. the irrevocable decision of the Patriarchates of Antiochia and Bulgaria to refrain from participating in the Synod;
3.
the problems in relations and communion between Churches (Jerusalem —
Аntioch because of Catar; deteriorating relations between us and the
Patriarchate of Romania, which are now hard to overcome, due to the
anti-canonical incursion of the latter into Eastern Serbia and the
founding of a parallel diocese there, which will lead to severing of
liturgical and canonical communion of the two neighbouring Churches if
the behavior described above is not terminated, and so on), conjointly
with the perspective of allowing these problems to not be solved at the
Synod but, rather, to be deferred to the post-Synodal period, as if any
commission can be an organ higher than the pan-Orthodox Synod, and
4.
the lack of will from our Mother Church of Constantinople to have at
least one of the proposals of our Church (such as the discussion on
autocephaly, right of bishops to vote at the Synod, on regarding the
synods from the ninth and fourteenth centuries as ecumenical already, in
the consciousness and practice of the Orthodox Church, and some other
ones, perhaps less significant) included into the thematic and agenda of
the Synod, and, as long as we remain obligated by the standpoints of
the Holy Assembly of Bishops of our Church, officially formulated two
years ago, as well as recently, at the end of the past month of May,
we
are compelled, with sadness — but also with full feeling of our
pastoral and, generally, ecclesial responsibility — to inform Your dear
and respected Holiness and Your Holy and Sacred Synod that, since all
this is so, our Church feels it difficult to participate in the summoned
Holy and Great Synod, and proposes that it be postponed for a certain
time: while our pending gathering at Crete, with the help of God, would
be regarded as a pre-Synodal inter-Orthodox consultation with the aim of
additionally preparing the Synod and improving its texts, or, at the
most, as the inaugural phase of the whole synodal process, which is to
be completed in subsequent continuation, in the next phase, when all
disagreements are removed in favor of unity of mind and consensus of
Churches. In this way, with the aid of God, the fruit of the Synod will
be seen as witness given to our uncorrupted faith, answer to hope which
abides in us as the message of salvation in Christ, directed to all,
both to those who are close to us and to those who are remote, and in no
case, God forbid, as germination of new pestilent schismas and
para-synagogues under the excuse of falsely proclaimed zealousness and
alleged preservation of Orthodoxy.
In regard to the said we remain Your Holiness’ humble brother and co-celebrant in the risen Christ
Аrchbishop of Peć, Metropolitan of Belgrade-Karlovci and
Serbian Patrijarch
Serbian Patrijarch
Irinej
President of the Holy Synod of Bishops
President of the Holy Synod of Bishops